arbiter
JournalsAccount

Common, Uncommon Sense: Visiting the Human‐Versus‐AI Argument

Danish Ahmed et al.

Journal of Economic Surveys2026https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70066article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Contemporary developments have empowered artificial intelligence (AI) to take a generalist approach: a single AI like ChatGPT can now solve problems from diverse fields. Here, we discuss the long‐debated human‐versus‐AI argument through a systematic review of AI literature from 1996–2024. While the strengths of AI are undeniable—it can perform various tasks from different bodies of knowledge more accurately and efficiently than humans—its output is hindered by the explainability of its information processing mechanism also known as explainable AI (XAI). This shortcoming of AI has reduced its feasibility. In the future, humans and AI can work synergistically: AI can support humans by doing tiring work, while humans assume the role of expert by maintaining AI performance and approving (and/or improving) its output.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70066

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{danish2026,
  title        = {{Common, Uncommon Sense: Visiting the Human‐Versus‐AI Argument}},
  author       = {Danish Ahmed et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Economic Surveys},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70066},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Common, Uncommon Sense: Visiting the Human‐Versus‐AI Argument

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.