“I thought I was appreciating”: The role of perpetrator intentions in perceptions of cultural appropriation

Shiri Spitz Siddiqi & Pia Dietze

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations2026https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261422600article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The role of perpetrator intentions in moral judgment is well established, but it is not well understood in the intergroup context of cultural appropriation. In three high-powered, pre-registered studies (total N = 2,769), we provide robust evidence that perceivers evaluate cultural copying less negatively when the actor has positive (versus negative) intentions. Across three different domains (fashion, food, and business), participants judged that White perpetrators who copied Black culture attempting to show appreciation were less appropriative, showed less disrespect, caused less harm, and warranted less confrontation (Studies 1–3) and boycotting (Study 3) than White perpetrators who copied for self-promotion. White individuals generally perceived less appropriation than Black individuals and evaluated it more permissively across dimensions, although both were similarly sensitive to intent (Studies 1–2). We contribute to the literatures on moral judgment and intergroup relations by laying empirical groundwork on cultural appropriation, an understudied phenomenon that unites the two.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261422600

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shiri2026,
  title        = {{“I thought I was appreciating”: The role of perpetrator intentions in perceptions of cultural appropriation}},
  author       = {Shiri Spitz Siddiqi & Pia Dietze},
  journal      = {Group Processes and Intergroup Relations},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302261422600},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

“I thought I was appreciating”: The role of perpetrator intentions in perceptions of cultural appropriation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.