Shared services in Australian local government: The Brighton common service model

Simone Valle de Souza & Brian Dollery

Journal of Economic and Social Policy2011article
ABDC C
Weight
0.34

What the paper says

A series of national and state public inquiries have established that the great majority of Australian local councils find themselves in straitened financial circumstances, with the problem of financial distress most acute in small regional, rural and remote local authorities. Given the spatial dimension of financial unsustainability, various solutions have been proposed, including shared service provision. While considerable ingenuity has been displayed by the local government sector across Australia in the implementation of a wide variety of different shared service models, the academic literature has unfortunately lagged far behind real-world developments. There is thus an urgent need for scholars of Australian local government to consider new shared service models in order to provide a critical assessment of these models as an aid to informed local government policy making. In an effort to meet this gap in the literature, this paper provides a detailed analysis of the common service provision model developed by the Brighton Council in southern Tasmania.

4 citations

Cite this paper

@article{simone2011,
  title        = {{Shared services in Australian local government: The Brighton common service model}},
  author       = {Simone Valle de Souza & Brian Dollery},
  journal      = {Journal of Economic and Social Policy},
  year         = {2011},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Shared services in Australian local government: The Brighton common service model

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.34

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.