arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Ethical issues in synthetic biology: a commentary

Wendy Rogers

Macquarie Law Journal2015article
ABDC C
Weight
0.34

What the paper says

This paper provides a brief overview of ethical issues associated with synthetic biology and identifies three ethical challenges to consider in the development and management of synthetic biology. First, the injunction to use synthetic biology for the good of humankind raises questions about who should determine the direction and uses of synthetic biology. This issue is discussed in terms of setting the research agenda. Second, there are questions about the extent to which bioethics is, and ought to be, a ‘critical companion’ for novel and emerging technologies. This question is stimulated by the observation that some of the most cogent criticisms of synthetic biology have come from within the field, rather than from external bioethical critiques. Finally, there are calls for professionalisation as a mechanism for self-regulation regarding ethical behaviour. However, as there are diverse disciplines engaged in synthetic biology, it may be difficult to settle on a single set of agreed professional norms.

6 citations

Cite this paper

@article{wendy2015,
  title        = {{Ethical issues in synthetic biology: a commentary}},
  author       = {Wendy Rogers},
  journal      = {Macquarie Law Journal},
  year         = {2015},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Ethical issues in synthetic biology: a commentary

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.34

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.