Domestic Veto Players and Negotiation Dynamics: Canadian Internal Politics and International Agreements

Fen Osler Hampson

Negotiation Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn.a.41article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Abstract This article explores the role of crucial domestic veto players in Canada’s internal negotiations and their respective influence on Canada’s international negotiating behavior. It argues that the veto power of these actors is both endogenously and exogenously determined but also contextual and dependent on the issues that are the subject of any given negotiation as well as the parties involved. The constellation of partisan veto players is also defined by the level of electoral support the governing party has in the House of Commons, the degree to which it is forced to rely on the support of other parties to stay in power, and the interests of the provinces and the federal bureaucracy in developing policy on any given issue(s). Hence, a dynamic, variable element exists in the power and influence that specific domestic veto players exercise at any given time.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn.a.41

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{fen2025,
  title        = {{Domestic Veto Players and Negotiation Dynamics: Canadian Internal Politics and International Agreements}},
  author       = {Fen Osler Hampson},
  journal      = {Negotiation Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn.a.41},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Domestic Veto Players and Negotiation Dynamics: Canadian Internal Politics and International Agreements

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.