arbiter
JournalsAccount

The limits of the child rights vernacularisation approach to ending child begging in Senegal’s Qur’anic schools

Shona Macleod

Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'etudes du developpement2026https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2026.2619099article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In Senegal, many non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have attempted to promote the rights of talibés – young boys studying in traditional residential Qur’anic schools, who are often required to beg – through workshops with their Qur’anic teachers. The NGOs employ specialists to relate child rights ideas to religious beliefs, a process akin to vernacularisation. Based on qualitative interview data collected in Senegal in 2017–2018, this article considers the limitations of this approach, demonstrating that, although Qur’anic teachers may remain unconvinced of messages around child begging, dismissing those unconvinced as illegitimate impostors allows NGOs to explain failures without changing their own worldview.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2026.2619099

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shona2026,
  title        = {{The limits of the child rights vernacularisation approach to ending child begging in Senegal’s Qur’anic schools}},
  author       = {Shona Macleod},
  journal      = {Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'etudes du developpement},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2026.2619099},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The limits of the child rights vernacularisation approach to ending child begging in Senegal’s Qur’anic schools

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.