Exploitation or Exploration? Innovation Strategy in Response to Rivals' M&A

Xin Deng et al.

Journal of Management Studies2026https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70091article
FT50AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper investigates the impact of rivals' Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) activities on the innovation orientation of firms that are not directly involved in these transactions, hereafter referred to as focal firms. Drawing on the Awareness‐Motivation‐Capability (AMC) framework, we find that rivals' M&A activities positively affect a focal firm's exploratory innovation, while negatively influencing its exploitative innovation, a dynamic that is predominantly driven by rival firms acting as acquirers. We further identify key boundary conditions that moderate this relationship and find that the influence of rival acquirers is amplified when their M&A deals are exploitative in nature, suggesting that focal firms respond strategically by differentiating through exploration. In addition, high levels of market competition intensify the positive effect of rival acquirers on focal firms' exploratory innovation. Finally, focal firms with greater financial slack are more likely to shift their innovation orientation towards exploration in response to rivals' M&A. Together, our findings reveal how external strategic moves by rivals can trigger forward‐looking innovation responses and highlight the importance of firm capabilities and market context in shaping these dynamics.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70091

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{xin2026,
  title        = {{Exploitation or Exploration? Innovation Strategy in Response to Rivals' M&A}},
  author       = {Xin Deng et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Management Studies},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.70091},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Exploitation or Exploration? Innovation Strategy in Response to Rivals' M&A

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.