Democratic Backsliding, Elite Polarization, and Job Seekers' Pursuit of Government Employment

Susan M. Miller & Sharon Gilad

Regulation and Governance2026https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70138article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Recent studies examine the conditions under which citizens in democracies are willing to endorse leaders who promote antidemocratic platforms. Less is known about the downstream ramifications of democratic backsliding on American citizens' attitudes and behaviors toward government. Specifically, no study has examined whether democratic backsliding affects citizens' willingness to engage with, collaborate with, and contribute to government. This article advances this research agenda by employing a conjoint experiment to assess the impact of state‐level democratic backsliding and elite polarization on Americans' attraction to state government employment among those who are actively seeking employment. Findings indicate that democratic backsliding, including political attacks on the state bureaucracy, alongside elite polarization, significantly and negatively affect job seekers' attraction to state government work. These findings suggest democratic backsliding and polarization repel potential job seekers, undermining the government's already limited capacity to compete with businesses over talent and its democratic resilience.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70138

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{susan2026,
  title        = {{Democratic Backsliding, Elite Polarization, and Job Seekers' Pursuit of Government Employment}},
  author       = {Susan M. Miller & Sharon Gilad},
  journal      = {Regulation and Governance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70138},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Democratic Backsliding, Elite Polarization, and Job Seekers' Pursuit of Government Employment

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.