Politics and tax reform: A comparative analysis of the implementation of a broad-based consumption tax in New Zealand, Australia and the United Kingdom

Clinton Alley et al.

Revenue Law Journal2015https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6745article
ABDC B
Weight
0.39

What the paper says

The introduction of a broad-based consumption tax in the form of a value added tax (VAT) in the United Kingdom (UK) and goods and services tax (GST) in New Zealand and Australia was politically challenging at the time. This article provides the rationale for their introduction and the process of that introduction in different political contexts. It discusses whether there are lessons that can be drawn as to the political indicators that may need to be present for implementation of significant tax reform, with particular reference to GST reform in Australia. When the history of this Parliament, this nation and this century is written, 30 June, 1999, will be recorded as a day of fundamental injustice - an injustice which is real, an injustice which is not simply conjured up by the fleeting rhetoric of politicians. It will be recorded as the day when the social compact that has governed this nation for the last 100 years was torn up. Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, then in opposition, on the introduction of the GST.

2 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6745

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{clinton2015,
  title        = {{Politics and tax reform: A comparative analysis of the implementation of a broad-based consumption tax in New Zealand, Australia and the United Kingdom}},
  author       = {Clinton Alley et al.},
  journal      = {Revenue Law Journal},
  year         = {2015},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6745},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Politics and tax reform: A comparative analysis of the implementation of a broad-based consumption tax in New Zealand, Australia and the United Kingdom

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.39

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.34 × 0.4 = 0.13
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.