Couples Underestimate Positive Affective Reactions to Financial Conversations

Ximena Garcia-Rada et al.

Social Psychological and Personality Science2026https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261427859article
AJG 3ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Falling in love, moving in together, and raising a family are exciting milestones for couples; importantly, money is a critical component of all these experiences. While couples generally merge their financial lives as their relationship becomes more committed, partners often struggle with financial communication. Across three diary studies using a two-wave prospective–retrospective design, we examine how romantic partners perceive—and ultimately experience—financial conversations. We find that individuals systematically underestimate how enjoyable, informative, and socially connecting these conversations will be. This misprediction occurs because partners underestimate the extent to which they will reach an agreement. Extending research focused on forecasting errors in interactions between strangers or non-romantic partners, we show that individuals can mispredict conversational outcomes in highly intimate relationships. These findings have practical implications for both practitioners (e.g., financial advisors and marriage counselors) and couples seeking to better align their (financial) expectations with reality.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261427859

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ximena2026,
  title        = {{Couples Underestimate Positive Affective Reactions to Financial Conversations}},
  author       = {Ximena Garcia-Rada et al.},
  journal      = {Social Psychological and Personality Science},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506261427859},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Couples Underestimate Positive Affective Reactions to Financial Conversations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.