Intelligence and job satisfaction in the USA and China

Cassandra Thompson & Samuel Lane

Journal of Technology Management in China2014https://doi.org/10.1108/jtmc-08-2014-0046article
ABDC C
Weight
0.40

What the paper says

Purpose – This study aims to evaluate both intelligence and job satisfaction of workers in the USA and China. Each topic will be studied individually, first, to determine the relationship between intelligence and job satisfaction. The statistics between China and the USA will then be compared and contrasted to assess how different cultures will affect emotional intelligence and job satisfaction of those in the workforce. Design/methodology/approach – A review of the empirical studies on intelligence and job satisfaction was performed and used to develop a model to guide future research. Findings – There is a negative relationship between intelligence and job satisfaction in the USA, but no studies have been done to compare both constructs cross-culturally. Research limitations/implications – The proposed study can be used to gain an understanding of the relationship between intelligence and job satisfaction across different cultures. Practical implications – The link between job satisfaction and intelligence can be used by employers to determine information about other aspects of their business, such as turnover rates of productive employees. Originality/value – Although there has been some research on the relation between intelligence and job satisfaction, notably by Ganzach (1998), very little has been done across cultures.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jtmc-08-2014-0046

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{cassandra2014,
  title        = {{Intelligence and job satisfaction in the USA and China}},
  author       = {Cassandra Thompson & Samuel Lane},
  journal      = {Journal of Technology Management in China},
  year         = {2014},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jtmc-08-2014-0046},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Intelligence and job satisfaction in the USA and China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.40

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.13 × 0.4 = 0.05
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.