Role of perceived organizational support in cross-cultural adjustment: A mediating career satisfaction model

Uroosa Aslam & Mohammad Fayaz

Journal of Transnational Management2022https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2022.2117512article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.45

What the paper says

Previous researches were focused on assigned expatriates (AEs) and their cross-cultural adjustment (CCA) and their perks and incentives. Self-initiated expatriates (SIEs) employees are self-made and mostly neglected pool of talent and mostly based from individual perspective. The purpose of this paper is to test the impact of perceived organizational support (POS) on CCA of SIEs employees mediated by career satisfaction (CS) of SIEs employees. We conducted mediation analysis on 124 SIEs working in USA, and result supported our proposed model. It shows that there is positive effect of POS on CCA and CS. And POS also shows positive indirect effect on CCA through CS. Further we discussed the implication and limitation of this study.

3 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2022.2117512

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{uroosa2022,
  title        = {{Role of perceived organizational support in cross-cultural adjustment: A mediating career satisfaction model}},
  author       = {Uroosa Aslam & Mohammad Fayaz},
  journal      = {Journal of Transnational Management},
  year         = {2022},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15475778.2022.2117512},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Role of perceived organizational support in cross-cultural adjustment: A mediating career satisfaction model

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.45

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.27 × 0.4 = 0.11
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.