arbiter
JournalsAccount

Tell me what I want to hear: The effects of matching reviews on consumers’ decision making

Long The Nguyen & Zachary J. Sheffler

Information & Management2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2026.104324article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Knowing online reviews are helpful for consumers’ decision-making, online shopping platforms often utilize review ranking algorithms to put “featured reviews” on top. This practice is supposed to help consumers navigate the vast quantity and varying quality of online reviews. However, it runs the risk of displaying reviews that do not match consumers’ shopping orientations – the preferences for certain product attributes. We investigate the consequences of this mismatch on consumers’ evaluation of review helpfulness and their downstream purchase decision quality. The research reveals the heterogeneous nature of online reviews by conducting topic modeling with an archival dataset. Next, we conduct experiments to examine the (mis)matching effects. We found that consumers see reviews matching their needs to be more helpful. They also make better shopping decisions. The benefit of matched reviews also holds across both positive and negative reviews. The paper offers theoretical contributions by highlighting the importance of matching reviews with consumers’ orientations and calling attention to the unintended consequences of review ranking practices on shopping platforms.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2026.104324

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{long2026,
  title        = {{Tell me what I want to hear: The effects of matching reviews on consumers’ decision making}},
  author       = {Long The Nguyen & Zachary J. Sheffler},
  journal      = {Information & Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2026.104324},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Tell me what I want to hear: The effects of matching reviews on consumers’ decision making

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.