arbiter
JournalsAccount

Time and narrative in climate litigation: Reflections on Pabai v Commonwealth of Australia

Joanna Kyriakakis

Alternative Law Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x261433611article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Time is a challenge for applicants in negligence-based climate litigation. Climate change harm is a temporally complex phenomenon that demands attention to the past, present and future, including histories of colonialism. Negligence law, however, demands temporal boundaries be drawn in order, among other things, to place limits on the scope and content of one person’s duty to be careful of another. Decisions regarding what time frames are relevant to an assessment of responsibility for climate harms are neither inevitable nor neutral. They have political and material implications for how law deals with historical legacies. This article explores how the temporal narrative of climate change in Pabai , and specifically the applicants’ claims regarding the existence of Commonwealth duties of care, challenged conventional boundaries of negligence law, while simultaneously being critical to the expressivist messaging of the case.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x261433611

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{joanna2026,
  title        = {{Time and narrative in climate litigation: Reflections on Pabai v Commonwealth of Australia}},
  author       = {Joanna Kyriakakis},
  journal      = {Alternative Law Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x261433611},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Time and narrative in climate litigation: Reflections on Pabai v Commonwealth of Australia

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.