arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Interstate Differences in the Cost of Complying With Feedlot Environmental Regulations: an Initial Investigation

Emma J.H. Ridley et al.

Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics1994https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.12396article
ABDC C
Weight
0.32

What the paper says

Environmental regulations impose construction and recurring costs on Australian feedlot operators. However to date there has been no published empirical information on these costs of environmental regulation. Additionally, variations in regulations between states and inconsistencies in the application of these regulations may have resulted in a pattern of location different from that dictated by least cost grain and feeder cattle inputs and processing and transportation services. The aim of this study was to attempt to measure the cost of complying with environmental regulations by large commercial feedlots in different Australian states. From data provided from a survey of 20 commercial feedlots it was found that the average cost of complying with these regulations was $36 per head of capacity. Substantial differences in these costs were found between New South Wales and Queensland, the two major producing states, with the more complex regulations in New South Wales resulting in higher costs.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.12396

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{emma1994,
  title        = {{Interstate Differences in the Cost of Complying With Feedlot Environmental Regulations: an Initial Investigation}},
  author       = {Emma J.H. Ridley et al.},
  journal      = {Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics},
  year         = {1994},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.12396},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Interstate Differences in the Cost of Complying With Feedlot Environmental Regulations: an Initial Investigation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.32

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.17 × 0.4 = 0.07
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.