arbiter
JournalsAccount

The moderating role of trust on the relation between a leader’s calling and an employee’s calling

Sophie Gerdel et al.

Career Development International2026https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-06-2025-0318article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Purpose Approaching work as a calling is associated with numerous positive outcomes; yet, we know little about how callings develop. Grounded in social cognitive career and meaning-making theory, this study explores whether leaders who are called to their roles foster the development of calling in their employees. Design/methodology/approach Using a three-wave longitudinal design with a sample of 285 US employees, we examined whether perceiving a leader as called – and trusting that leader – predicts growth in employees’ sense of calling over time. Findings Results indicate that perceiving calling in a leader fosters the development of calling when the leader is trusted and lowers calling in employees when the leader is not trusted. We found evidence that this process is incremental and slow compared to other modeling processes, requiring four to eight months to be detected. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by identifying leaders as potential socialization agents in the development of calling. The practical and theoretical implications of these results are discussed.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-06-2025-0318

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sophie2026,
  title        = {{The moderating role of trust on the relation between a leader’s calling and an employee’s calling}},
  author       = {Sophie Gerdel et al.},
  journal      = {Career Development International},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-06-2025-0318},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The moderating role of trust on the relation between a leader’s calling and an employee’s calling

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.