← Back to results Reply to Comment on “EU Taxonomy: Mission Impossible” Stefan Kooths
Abstract The Comment by Mehmandoost Kotlar (2024) misses the main point in the Critique of the EU taxonomy put forward in Kooths (2023). This Critique does not discuss the targets underlying the EU taxonomy but claims that this policy instrument is unsuitable for reaching these targets.
Open in an MCP-compatible agent ↗
Open via your library → Cite
Cite this paper https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2025-0009 Copy URL
Or copy a formatted citation
BibTeX RIS APA Chicago Link
@article{stefan2025,
title = {{Reply to Comment on “EU Taxonomy: Mission Impossible”}},
author = {Stefan Kooths},
journal = {Economists' Voice},
year = {2025},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2025-0009},
} TY - JOUR
TI - Reply to Comment on “EU Taxonomy: Mission Impossible”
AU - Kooths, Stefan
JO - Economists' Voice
PY - 2025
ER - Stefan Kooths (2025). Reply to Comment on “EU Taxonomy: Mission Impossible”. *Economists' Voice*. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2025-0009 Stefan Kooths. "Reply to Comment on “EU Taxonomy: Mission Impossible”." *Economists' Voice* (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2025-0009. Reply to Comment on “EU Taxonomy: Mission Impossible”
Stefan Kooths · Economists' Voice · 2025
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2025-0009 Copy
Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.
Flag this paper Evidence weight Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
F · citation impact 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 M · momentum 0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07 V · venue signal 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 R · text relevance † 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.