You Do It, AI Does It, You Compare and Reflect: Exploring Reflective Learning With Generative AI in Principles of Marketing
Anas Al‐Fattal
Abstract
This study explores how a structured comparative assignment, “You do it, GAI does it, you compare and reflect,” can support reflective learning in marketing education. Drawing on a dual methodology of systematic literature review and thematic analysis of student reflections, the article examines how students respond to generative artificial intelligence (GAI) when asked to compare their own environmental scan with one produced by GAI. The findings suggest that students are not passive users of GAI, but rather engage with it as a dialogic partner, one that challenges assumptions, prompts refinement, and deepens insight. The study identifies five key constructs that emerged from integrating insights from the literature and student reflections: reflective dialogues, situated judgment, model-based scaffolding, ethical engagement, and meta-learning. These constructs describe how students reflected on their learning, evaluated the role of context and human reasoning, recognized the value of structure in GAI output, and considered the ethical and metacognitive dimensions of using GAI in academic work. The study offers a conceptual model for understanding reflective engagement with GAI and outlines future research directions to build on this work. It concludes by highlighting the importance of designing assignments that promote critical reflection alongside technological integration.
3 citations
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13 |
| M · momentum | 0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.