Brown bonds in a green world: Are investors punishing high-carbon issuers with illiquidity?

Alexander Schoeffel et al.

Journal of Empirical Finance2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2026.101691article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

• Share of corporate bond funds with green portfolios grew from 10% 2013 to 15% 2024 • There is no evidence that carbon intensity permanently leads to bond illiquidity • High-carbon bonds exhibit short-lived heightened illiquidity around Paris Agreement • Increased share of green funds is not linked to illiquidity in high-carbon bonds • Carbon-intense sectors remain economically attractive to investors We investigate whether corporate bond liquidity is negatively impacted by issuers' carbon intensity, particularly given the rising share of sustainably investing bond funds. Using several established illiquidity measures, we analyze the long-term impact of carbon performance on bond illiquidity. We do not find conclusive evidence that carbon intensity leads to bond illiquidity; however, we find evidence that bonds from high-carbon issuers exhibited heightened illiquidity around the Paris Agreement. A higher share of funds holding low-carbon portfolios does not seem to be associated with improved liquidity in low-carbon bonds. Despite the growing market share of sustainability-oriented funds, continued investment in brown bonds suggests that carbon-intensive sectors remain economically attractive to investors.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2026.101691

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alexander2026,
  title        = {{Brown bonds in a green world: Are investors punishing high-carbon issuers with illiquidity?}},
  author       = {Alexander Schoeffel et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Empirical Finance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2026.101691},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Brown bonds in a green world: Are investors punishing high-carbon issuers with illiquidity?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.