arbiter
JournalsAccount

Track Two Dialogue in Times of War – Unsuitable or Advancing Peace for Ukraine?

Oliver Fink & Wilfried Graf

International Negotiation: a journal of theory and practice2025https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-bja10118article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Massive intergroup violence such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues to inflict devastating harm to individuals and societies. Civil societies generally do not need to remain inactive and can support peace processes even in severely escalated, apparently unsolvable intergroup conflicts. However, such engagement is delicate, and the exact conditions that make such commitment possible and effective in ‘classic’ interstate war settings remain unclear. Herbert C. Kelman (1927–2022), a social psychologist at Harvard University, developed seminal approaches of unofficial ‘Track Two’ diplomacy and problem-solving, mainly in the Israeli-Palestinian intergroup conflict. Using metatheory and critical hermeneutics, we suggest its current updated form is the conceptual enhancement from inter-group to complex intra/inter-national settings. Therefore, Track Two approaches can be valuable in the Russia/Ukraine setting. The paper outlines initial efforts of ongoing facilitated dialogue, unilateral on both sides and inter-coordinational between , offering inroads in an interstate context where conflict transformation is desperately needed.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-bja10118

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{oliver2025,
  title        = {{Track Two Dialogue in Times of War – Unsuitable or Advancing Peace for Ukraine?}},
  author       = {Oliver Fink & Wilfried Graf},
  journal      = {International Negotiation: a journal of theory and practice},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-bja10118},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Track Two Dialogue in Times of War – Unsuitable or Advancing Peace for Ukraine?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.