arbiter
JournalsAccount

China in Twenty-Five Years of Global Environmental Politics: The Case of Climate Diplomacy

Joanna I. Lewis et al.

Global Environmental Politics2026https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.729article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

China’s role in global environmental politics (GEP) has evolved dramatically over the past twenty-five years to occupy an increasingly paradoxical place in global climate politics. It has become both the world’s largest builder of renewable energy and its largest consumer of coal, as well as a climate leader of the South that rejects mandatory climate finance or technology obligations while providing support through South–South cooperation. This dual role presents a contradiction at the heart of global climate governance, leading to ambiguity surrounding China’s likely future climate leadership. We demonstrate how many of China’s key negotiating positions can be explained as a two-level game balancing domestic and international priorities. We focus on technology transfer and climate finance and on developments since Paris and outside of the UNFCCC context. Our findings contribute to an understanding of new dynamics in GEP, including changing power and leadership dynamics, and the increasingly central role of domestic industrial policy.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.729

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{joanna2026,
  title        = {{China in Twenty-Five Years of Global Environmental Politics: The Case of Climate Diplomacy}},
  author       = {Joanna I. Lewis et al.},
  journal      = {Global Environmental Politics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.a.729},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

China in Twenty-Five Years of Global Environmental Politics: The Case of Climate Diplomacy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.