The Tax Treatment of Haircuts in Financial Reorganizations

Aurelio Gurrea‐Martínez & Vincent Ooi

Revenue Law Journal2020https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.13682article
ABDC B
Weight
0.39

What the paper says

Over the past few years, Singapore has implemented various ambitious insolvency reforms aimed at making the country an international hub for debt restructuring. This article argues that while Singapore has put in place one of the most sophisticated restructuring frameworks in the world, some tax reforms might be useful to maximise the potential of this new restructuring framework. Namely, it will be pointed out that the tax treatment of debt forgiveness granted by creditors in corporate reorganisation (‘haircuts’) should be reviewed. Under the current legislation, these haircuts may be treated as taxable income. As a result, financially distressed debtors may be required to pay taxes for certain income that did not involve any actual generation of cash flows. This article argues that, by implementing tax reforms, local and foreign companies will be able to maximise the benefits associated with having access to the efficient insolvency framework implemented in Singapore.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.13682

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{aurelio2020,
  title        = {{The Tax Treatment of Haircuts in Financial Reorganizations}},
  author       = {Aurelio Gurrea‐Martínez & Vincent Ooi},
  journal      = {Revenue Law Journal},
  year         = {2020},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.13682},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Tax Treatment of Haircuts in Financial Reorganizations

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.39

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.12 × 0.4 = 0.05
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.