arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Home Advantage in Professional Surfing: Are Local Surfers Better? Are Local Judges More Challenging?

Darius L. Naumann & Jürgen Rösch

International Journal of Sport Finance2026https://doi.org/10.1177/15586235251403230article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Home advantage has been a topic of sports economics research for decades. Although research has found proof for home advantage in many team sports, literature about its role in individual sports is less frequent. Thus, it is still being determined whether (i) home advantage is a significant factor for individual sports and whether (ii) the causes and effects of team sports are transferable and equally valid. In this paper, we provide insights into the existence of home advantage in professional surfing competitions (World Surf League). Our final dataset with 21,013 observations allows us to disentangle the influence of home surfers and judge panel constellations on athlete performances and to test for the combination of both. Even though home advantage does not seem to have a major influence, we find evidence for a potential domestic bias in both the average points scored and the chances of winning a heat per athlete.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15586235251403230

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{darius2026,
  title        = {{Home Advantage in Professional Surfing: Are Local Surfers Better? Are Local Judges More Challenging?}},
  author       = {Darius L. Naumann & Jürgen Rösch},
  journal      = {International Journal of Sport Finance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/15586235251403230},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Home Advantage in Professional Surfing: Are Local Surfers Better? Are Local Judges More Challenging?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.