Perceived comfort and subjective life evaluation in the Philippines: Evidence from a national visioning exercise

Paul Andrew Lucena et al.

Philippine Review of Economics2025https://doi.org/10.37907/4erp5202darticle
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study examines how Filipinos evaluate their current life status and determines the factors associated with achieving a “comfortable life”, utilizing data from the National Economic and Development Authority’s (NEDA) Long-Term Vision exercise (AmBisyon Natin 2040). Instead of measuring subjective well-being in the conventional sense of happiness or life satisfaction, this research interprets respondents’ self-assessed comfort levels—categorized as “poor,” “sometimes poor and sometimes comfortable,” or “at least comfortable”—as indicators of perceived material security and life adequacy. Using a generalized ordered logistic model, the results demonstrate that income, livelihood, and education are critical drivers of achieving at least a comfortable life. Similarly, satisfaction with health, education, and community environment also increases the likelihood of reporting comfort. The findings provide insights into the socio-economic and environmental correlates of Filipinos’ perceived quality of life, as articulated through this national visioning exercise.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37907/4erp5202d

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{paul2025,
  title        = {{Perceived comfort and subjective life evaluation in the Philippines: Evidence from a national visioning exercise}},
  author       = {Paul Andrew Lucena et al.},
  journal      = {Philippine Review of Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37907/4erp5202d},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Perceived comfort and subjective life evaluation in the Philippines: Evidence from a national visioning exercise

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.