arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Impact of ESG Rating Divergence on Excess Cash Holdings: Evidence From China A‐Share Listed Firms

Qun Cao et al.

Accounting and Finance2026https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70179article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between ESG rating divergence and corporate excess cash holdings, employing a sample of Chinese A‐share listed companies from 2015 to 2021. Our findings reveal a significant positive relationship between ESG rating divergence and firms' excess cash holdings, a conclusion robust to various sensitivity analyses. Heterogeneity analyses further demonstrate that the effect of ESG rating divergence on excess cash holdings is amplified under conditions of cross‐ownership, heightened media scrutiny, and greater corporate financing constraints. Moreover, our study uncovers several mechanisms through which ESG rating divergence influences excess cash holdings, including exacerbating information asymmetry, amplifying environmental uncertainty, and heightening operational risk. This research contributes not only to a deeper understanding of the economic ramifications of ESG rating divergence and its influence on excess cash holdings but also offers valuable insights into the cash management decisions of listed companies, fostering sustainable enterprise development.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70179

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{qun2026,
  title        = {{The Impact of ESG Rating Divergence on Excess Cash Holdings: Evidence From China A‐Share Listed Firms}},
  author       = {Qun Cao et al.},
  journal      = {Accounting and Finance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70179},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Impact of ESG Rating Divergence on Excess Cash Holdings: Evidence From China A‐Share Listed Firms

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.