arbiter
JournalsAccount

Widowhood and cognitive function among older Chinese

Qin Li et al.

Journal of Demographic Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2025.10006article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Using three waves (2011–15) of CHARLS data, we analyze the short-term effects of widowhood on cognitive function among older Chinese. Fixed-effect models show that widowhood has significant adverse effects on cognition for rural elders but not for urban ones. Furthermore, compared to rural men, rural women exhibit greater declines in cognition, especially in fluid cognition. We explore the possible mechanism from the neighborhood perspective. The results show that community sports and entertainment facilities and public services can effectively mitigate the negative impact of widowhood on cognitive function for rural widows. Sports and entertainment facilities can mainly enhance word recall ability, especially delayed word recall. Public services such as elderly health centers focusing on the healthcare function for the elderly can also improve the word recall ability of rural widows. On the other hand, family-based elderly care centers mainly increase the cognition ability of mental intactness.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2025.10006

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{qin2025,
  title        = {{Widowhood and cognitive function among older Chinese}},
  author       = {Qin Li et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Demographic Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2025.10006},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Widowhood and cognitive function among older Chinese

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.