arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Retraction notice: Social influences on the psychological well-being of elderly individuals

Unknown author

Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences2025https://doi.org/10.1108/jhass-11-2025-0226article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The Editor-in-Chief and the publisher of Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences wish to retract the article by Mohammad Shahadat Hossen and Siti Fatimah Binti Salleh, Social influences on the psychological well-being of elderly individuals, Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences August 15, 2025; 7 (4): 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHASS-01-2024-0010. It has come to our attention that a large portion of this article is taken, without full and proper attribution, from an earlier work by Kovalenko, O.H. and Spivak, L.M. (2018) “Psychological well-being of elderly people: the social factors”, Social Welfare: Interdisciplinary Approach, 8(1), pp. 163–176. doi:10.21277/sw.v1i8.323. The decision to retract has been informed by COPE's guidelines on retractions and Emerald's publishing ethics. Emerald's editorial and originality policy guidelines make it clear that work submitted should be original, not infringe any existing copyright, or be currently under consideration for publication by any other journal or publication. The publisher of the journal sincerely apologizes to the readers.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jhass-11-2025-0226

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2025,
  title        = {{Retraction notice: Social influences on the psychological well-being of elderly individuals}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jhass-11-2025-0226},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Retraction notice: Social influences on the psychological well-being of elderly individuals

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.