arbiter
JournalsAccount

Navigating CEO Sociopolitical Engagement: Implications for HRD

Christine Fandrich

Human Resource Development Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.70016article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This article examines how CEOs navigate sociopolitical engagement and the implications for human resource development (HRD). Drawing on qualitative data from semi‐structured interviews with 15 public and private U.S. CEOs who have engaged in sociopolitical issues, the study explores how leaders interpret and respond to contested social and political events affecting their organizations. Thematic analysis shows that sociopolitical engagement involves moral sensemaking, leadership identity work, emotional and cognitive complexity, employee voice, and stakeholder management. Findings highlight how employees often act as catalysts and partners in collective sensemaking, while leaders translate values into organizational policies and practices. The article outlines implications for HRD in developing leaders' ethical discernment, enabling employee dialogue, and embedding organizational learning systems that support responsible engagement in sociopolitical contexts.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.70016

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christine2026,
  title        = {{Navigating CEO Sociopolitical Engagement: Implications for HRD}},
  author       = {Christine Fandrich},
  journal      = {Human Resource Development Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.70016},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Navigating CEO Sociopolitical Engagement: Implications for HRD

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.