“Informal” Land Demarcation Systems: A Lifeline to De-Escalation of Land Conflicts and Promotion of Peace in Post-War Acholiland, Northern Uganda

Eria Serwajja & Muhamed Lunyago

Afrika Spectrum2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00020397251408086article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study examines how the re-emerging “informal” land demarcation systems contribute to the de-escalation of land conflicts and promotion of peace in post-war Northern Uganda. Although relative peace and normalcy have returned to Northern Uganda following the LRA war, the Acholi subregion continues to grapple with land conflicts, which have complicated the resettlement and development of rural communities. However, rural communities, which bear the heaviest brunt of land conflicts, are not merely spectators. This paper explores and theorises the ways in which communities mobilise a rich repertoire of “everyday resources” to counter and address the contestations over land. The initiatives “from below” include boundary-tree planting, engraving names of landowners on trees, and digging holes around the contested land as boundary demarcations and “identity” markers. By emphasising harmonious post-conflict co-existence, these initiatives contribute to a reduction in land conflicts and foster peacebuilding.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00020397251408086

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{eria2026,
  title        = {{“Informal” Land Demarcation Systems: A Lifeline to De-Escalation of Land Conflicts and Promotion of Peace in Post-War Acholiland, Northern Uganda}},
  author       = {Eria Serwajja & Muhamed Lunyago},
  journal      = {Afrika Spectrum},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00020397251408086},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

“Informal” Land Demarcation Systems: A Lifeline to De-Escalation of Land Conflicts and Promotion of Peace in Post-War Acholiland, Northern Uganda

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.