arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Using machine learning to predict performance of trial court administration: An empirical study with iranian performance indicators of trial case processing

Mohadeseh A Farzammehr et al.

Journal of Statistical Research2025https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v58i2.80626article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper explores the significance of evaluating justice system performance to ensure effectiveness across diverse legal frameworks. Traditionally, methods like expert surveys and document analysis were used to generate empirical indicators. However, this study employs machine learning to predict trial court performance, using key processing indicators. Data from 21 branches of the General Court of Law in Tehran, Iran, comprising 119 case management records, is analyzed. logistic regression proves most effective among various models, achieving 98.5% AUC and 95.0% CA. Results indicate that resolved cases impact positively, while pending cases have minimal influence. Monitoring time and working days contribute insignificantly. Early detection of negative performance issues is crucial for maintaining public trust. Regular evaluations not only enhance court efficiency but also aid in developing decision support systems for improved performance. Journal of Statistical Research 2024, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp.385-395

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v58i2.80626

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mohadeseh2025,
  title        = {{Using machine learning to predict performance of trial court administration: An empirical study with iranian performance indicators of trial case processing}},
  author       = {Mohadeseh A Farzammehr et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Statistical Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v58i2.80626},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Using machine learning to predict performance of trial court administration: An empirical study with iranian performance indicators of trial case processing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.