Gatekeepers of the Undesired? A systematic review on local housing policy and the settlement of vulnerable groups

Gustav Lidén et al.

Journal of Public Policy2025https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x24000291review
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.46

Abstract

A neglected dimension of housing policy is how municipalities use it as a gatekeeping mechanism to exclude vulnerable groups and thereby control their territory. To examine this topic, we apply a systematic review that draws on the international academic literature and utilizes three bibliometric analyses. First, statistical analysis reveals the field’s growth and how it is characterized by publications often combining an impressive set of data and methods. Second, the material is explored through network analysis, emphasizing how a few important journals lead the distribution of knowledge. Finally, a thematic analysis highlights consistency in the detrimental effects of exclusionary policies across different contexts. A distinction between planned excluding practices and policies with such unintended effects are also evident. The analysis underscores the conflict between individual responsibilities and societal obligations, where current policies tend to place substantial burdens on the individual.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x24000291

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{gustav2025,
  title        = {{Gatekeepers of the Undesired? A systematic review on local housing policy and the settlement of vulnerable groups}},
  author       = {Gustav Lidén et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Public Policy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x24000291},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Gatekeepers of the Undesired? A systematic review on local housing policy and the settlement of vulnerable groups

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.