arbiter
JournalsAccount

Does ESG Report Tone Influence ESG Rating Divergence? Evidence From China

Yanmei Luo et al.

Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting2025https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12245article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.54

Abstract

Tone, as a key linguistic feature of corporate narrative disclosures, plays a crucial role in shaping information users' evaluation of firm performance. However, whether and how the tone in ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) reports influences rating agencies' assessments of firms' ESG performance remains underexplored. Using data from Chinese listed firms between 2018 and 2022, we explore the impact of ESG report tone on ESG rating divergence. Our findings indicate that positive expressions in ESG reports worsen the divergence in ESG ratings, particularly in the environmental ratings. Conversely, negative expressions in ESG reports enhance consistency in rating outcomes. Heterogeneity tests reveal that greater positive expressions in ESG reports exacerbate rating divergence only when firms' ESG reports exhibit low credibility, as indicated by mandatory disclosure, low readability, and high media pressure. In contrast, the impact of negative statements in ESG reports on consistency in rating outcomes is unaffected by the credibility of ESG reports. Our study contributes to the existing literature on the relationship between ESG report textual quality and ESG rating divergence in emerging markets.

9 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12245

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yanmei2025,
  title        = {{Does ESG Report Tone Influence ESG Rating Divergence? Evidence From China}},
  author       = {Yanmei Luo et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12245},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Does ESG Report Tone Influence ESG Rating Divergence? Evidence From China

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.54

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.52 × 0.4 = 0.21
M · momentum0.72 × 0.15 = 0.11
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.