Empirical Assessment of the Impact of Corruption and Public Spending on Sustainable Development: Evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression

Thị Lam Ho & Le Hong Ngoc

Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics2026https://doi.org/10.7866/hpe-rpe.26.1.1article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study aims to examine the impact of corruption and public spending on sustainable development. We use data from 38 developing countries for the period 2000-2022, employing the method of moments quantile regression (MMQR) estimation recently developed by Machado and Santos Silva (2019), and test robustness with S-GMM. Research results show that corruption has a major impact on sustainable development at all levels, indicating that corruption hinders efforts to achieve sustainability in developing countries. Interestingly, we find public spending to have an asymmetric impact on sustainable development: a negative impact is found at low quantiles, but the impact becomes positive at high quantiles as management efficiency increases. From the research results, we propose some policy implications to control corruption and increase the efficiency of public spending to promote sustainable development in developing countries.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7866/hpe-rpe.26.1.1

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{thị2026,
  title        = {{Empirical Assessment of the Impact of Corruption and Public Spending on Sustainable Development: Evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression}},
  author       = {Thị Lam Ho & Le Hong Ngoc},
  journal      = {Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7866/hpe-rpe.26.1.1},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Empirical Assessment of the Impact of Corruption and Public Spending on Sustainable Development: Evidence from Method of Moments Quantile Regression

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.