Revisiting Our Understanding of Major Power Diplomacy: The Causes and Consequences of High-Level Diplomatic Visits with China, 1960–2020

Shen Chen & Hankyeul Yang

International Studies Quarterly2026https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag009article
AJG 4ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

What are the causes and consequences of high-level visits with China? How much do we understand about major power diplomacy? This research note complements the recent scholarship by introducing a new dataset on high-level diplomatic visits from and to China between 1960 and 2020, with data on visits conducted by leaders and foreign ministers. We use this substantially improved dataset to test our theory on the effect of leader visits with China on the regime survival of the host countries. We find that leader visits with China are effective for prolonging the regime survival of countries most susceptible to Chinese influence, while no clear effects are found for democratic regimes. We next test a theory on the asymmetry in the granting of an audience with the leader during foreign minister visits: we argue that as China’s global power grew over time since 2000, Chinese leaders have been less likely to grant an audience to a visiting foreign minister from another country while visiting Chinese foreign ministers have been more likely to be granted an audience with the leader of the host country.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag009

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{shen2026,
  title        = {{Revisiting Our Understanding of Major Power Diplomacy: The Causes and Consequences of High-Level Diplomatic Visits with China, 1960–2020}},
  author       = {Shen Chen & Hankyeul Yang},
  journal      = {International Studies Quarterly},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqag009},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Revisiting Our Understanding of Major Power Diplomacy: The Causes and Consequences of High-Level Diplomatic Visits with China, 1960–2020

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.