Fast estimation of the Renshaw-Haberman model and its variants

Yiping Guo & Johnny Siu‐Hang Li

European Actuarial Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-025-00407-warticle
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

In mortality modelling, cohort effects are often taken into consideration as they add insights about variations in mortality across different generations. Statistically speaking, models such as the Renshaw-Haberman model may provide a better fit to historical data compared to their counterparts that incorporate no cohort effects. However, when such models are estimated using an iterative maximum likelihood method in which parameters are updated one at a time, convergence is typically slow and may not even be reached within a reasonably established maximum number of iterations. Among others, the slow convergence problem hinders the study of parameter uncertainty through bootstrapping methods. In this paper, we propose an intuitive estimation method that minimizes the sum of squared errors between actual and fitted log central death rates. The complications arising from the incorporation of cohort effects are overcome by formulating part of the optimization as a principal component analysis with missing values. Using mortality data from various populations, we demonstrate that our proposed method produces satisfactory estimation results and is significantly more efficient compared to the traditional likelihood-based approach.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-025-00407-w

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yiping2025,
  title        = {{Fast estimation of the Renshaw-Haberman model and its variants}},
  author       = {Yiping Guo & Johnny Siu‐Hang Li},
  journal      = {European Actuarial Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-025-00407-w},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Fast estimation of the Renshaw-Haberman model and its variants

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.