Exploring the Game: Revealing the Contextual Conditions and Strategies of Latent Negotiation

Sabrina Marx & Markus Voeth

Negotiation Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn.a.58article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract In business-to-business environments characterized by uncertainty and interdependence, much of what shapes negotiation outcomes occurs beyond the formal table. Building on the concept of latent negotiations, understood as informal interaction episodes in which negotiation-relevant issues are addressed without explicit framing as negotiation, this study examines the contextual and perceptual conditions that enable such dynamics to emerge. Combining expert interviews with a conjoint analysis among negotiation practitioners, the findings show that face-to-face, one-to-one exchanges embedded in ongoing relationships and involving indirect issue framing are perceived as most conducive, whereas written communication and asymmetric constellations are perceived as less conducive. At the same time, the empirical results indicate that latent negotiations can arise in a range of other interactional forms, underscoring the need to remain attentive to contextual cues in everyday exchanges. The study contributes to negotiation research by conceptualizing negotiation as a continuum of interactions shaped by perception, context, and relational framing.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn.a.58

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sabrina2026,
  title        = {{Exploring the Game: Revealing the Contextual Conditions and Strategies of Latent Negotiation}},
  author       = {Sabrina Marx & Markus Voeth},
  journal      = {Negotiation Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn.a.58},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Exploring the Game: Revealing the Contextual Conditions and Strategies of Latent Negotiation

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.