arbiter
JournalsAccount

Epistemic welfare and algorithmic recommender systems: overcoming the epistemic crisis in the digitalized public sphere

Aaron Hyzen et al.

Communication Theory2025https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf018article
ABDC A
Weight
0.48

Abstract

Working with the concept of epistemic welfare, defined as creating and maintaining the conditions and capabilities for individuals’ epistemic agency in the public sphere, this contribution provides a theoretical framework to demonstrate a way out of what has been described as an epistemic crisis, illustrating this with the case of algorithmic recommender systems used by media organizations. First, we identify the processes of datafication, algorithmization and platformization and their impact on the public sphere, specifically how they disrupt knowledge production, dissemination and acquisition. Next, we combine social epistemology, welfare studies and communication research to build a framework that allows analyzing how well communicative social practices, procedures and institutions fulfill epistemic standards and, thus, contribute to individuals’ opportunities to exercise their epistemic agency and reach epistemically valuable states. Finally, we discuss epistemic welfare’s implications for media governance, i.e., building conditions and capabilities that ensure epistemic agency.

5 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf018

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{aaron2025,
  title        = {{Epistemic welfare and algorithmic recommender systems: overcoming the epistemic crisis in the digitalized public sphere}},
  author       = {Aaron Hyzen et al.},
  journal      = {Communication Theory},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaf018},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Epistemic welfare and algorithmic recommender systems: overcoming the epistemic crisis in the digitalized public sphere

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.