Accounting in three dimensions: a case for momentum
Eric Melse
What the paper says
To this day, triple‐entry accounting and momentum accounting are seldom applied. We regret this because of the growing need for more forward‐looking information by management and external stakeholders and the apparent lack of theory and practical solutions. The ever‐increasing pace of the economy incites the need to disclose trends on the microeconomic level of a company. Further to this point, recent developments related to corporate governance, give new imputs to search for the answer to the question if we can improve the reliability and effectiveness of accounting in general, and financial statements in particular. This paper may contribute in to a better understanding of the concept that underpins momentum accounting. We present a notional example concerning the balance sheet ratio: return on equity. This example, so we hope, should encourage practitioners and academics to explore the usability of triple‐entry accounting and momentum accounting as alternative means to provide more forward‐looking information.
8 citations
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.40 × 0.4 = 0.16 |
| M · momentum | 0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.