Exploring the Accessibility of Food Festivals for Older Adults Through the Perspectives of Journey Experience, Value Chain, and Universal Design

Yim King Penny Wan & Sow Hup Joanne Chan

Event Management2026https://doi.org/10.3727/152599526x17695712079101article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This research explored the accessibility of food festivals to older adults through the lens of journey experience, value chain, and universal design. Qualitative semi-structured interviews with 26 attendees of the Macao Food Festival were conducted. The results showed that in the pre-festival, consideration and embarking stages, equitable and accessible dissemination of information was important for the older attendees. In the consumption stage, accessible services and facilities, safety, and flexible food options were desired. In the post-festival phase, some follow-up services would help older attendees to recall their good memories at the festival and develop a feeling of social inclusivity. This study highlights the crucial roles of seamless integration of universally designed services and facilities at the various festival phases to ensure that older attendees’ festival journey experience is enhanced while fostering a more inclusive society. Practical implications were suggested.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3727/152599526x17695712079101

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yim2026,
  title        = {{Exploring the Accessibility of Food Festivals for Older Adults Through the Perspectives of Journey Experience, Value Chain, and Universal Design}},
  author       = {Yim King Penny Wan & Sow Hup Joanne Chan},
  journal      = {Event Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3727/152599526x17695712079101},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Exploring the Accessibility of Food Festivals for Older Adults Through the Perspectives of Journey Experience, Value Chain, and Universal Design

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.