arbiter
JournalsAccount

Innovation systems: a bibliometric review of the contemporary research employing natural language processing

Hidde Jansen

International Journal of Innovation Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2025.04.001review
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Innovation systems research has seen rapid evolution, expanding in both depth and scope. The increasing frequency of contributions has added complexity, posing challenges for scholars and practitioners in management and policy. This paper employs advanced data-driven techniques, including natural language processing and machine learning, to map and analyze contemporary research. Focusing on studies between 2001 and 2023, the investigation introduces a novel clustering of sub-topics, tracking their dynamics and evolution over time. It highlights a growing emphasis on National Innovation Systems , Institutional Cooperation Networks , and Frameworks and Process Modelling . Although European research remains dominant, contributions from emerging economies are steadily increasing, underscoring the global importance of innovation. By highlighting key concepts, influential works, and mapping recent shifts in the field, this paper offers a focused analysis of the current state of innovation systems research, prioritizing developments from the last two decades and shedding light on emerging areas of attention.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2025.04.001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hidde2025,
  title        = {{Innovation systems: a bibliometric review of the contemporary research employing natural language processing}},
  author       = {Hidde Jansen},
  journal      = {International Journal of Innovation Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2025.04.001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Innovation systems: a bibliometric review of the contemporary research employing natural language processing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.