arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Supervising Your In‐Group? How Social Identification Shapes Financial Sector Regulatory Leniency

Dennis Veltrop et al.

Regulation and Governance2026https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70147article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Both practitioners and governance scholars recognize the importance of external oversight, especially in regulated industries like the financial sector. However, the failure of financial sector regulators and enforcement officials (supervisors) to act is often cited as a primary cause of ineffective governance. Drawing on social identity theory, we hypothesize that social identities influence how supervisors perform their supervisory duties. We tested our predictions using a unique experimental design and survey of supervisors working at two Dutch financial sector supervisory agencies. Consistent with our main argument, we find that supervisors' social identification with the financial sector leads to lenient supervision. Additionally, we demonstrate that prior experience in the financial sector indirectly fosters leniency through sector identification and that this pathway is weaker for supervisors with a strong professional identity. These results clarify how and when sector identification impacts financial sector supervision.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70147

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{dennis2026,
  title        = {{Supervising Your In‐Group? How Social Identification Shapes Financial Sector Regulatory Leniency}},
  author       = {Dennis Veltrop et al.},
  journal      = {Regulation and Governance},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70147},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Supervising Your In‐Group? How Social Identification Shapes Financial Sector Regulatory Leniency

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.