Anti-Tax Avoidance Rules and Tax Complexity

Deborah Schanz et al.

World Tax Journal2025https://doi.org/10.59403/29r4azaarticle
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

In recent years, many countries have introduced new anti-tax avoidance rules, which are often criticized for increasing tax complexity. Motivated by these concerns, our study investigates how the design of anti-tax avoidance rules and country characteristics are related to this perceived complexity. Based on hand-collected data for 57 countries, we find that most elements of anti-tax avoidance rules that are intended to be taxpayer friendly do not reduce perceived complexity. We show that taxpayer-friendliness is discussed and operationalized in different ways. For example, simplifying elements such as generous de minimis thresholds can limit the complexity of such rules, while adding supplementary taxpayer-specific components, such as the stand-alone entity exception to interest deduction limitations, does not reduce complexity. In a cross-country study, we find that controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules are perceived as more complex in developing countries than in developed countries. Country case studies suggest that developing countries struggle with the information exchange required for CFC rules, making them more difficult to administer. By contrast, we find that general anti-avoidance rules (GAARs) are perceived as less complex in developing countries, presumably because they are often poorly enforced.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/29r4aza

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{deborah2025,
  title        = {{Anti-Tax Avoidance Rules and Tax Complexity}},
  author       = {Deborah Schanz et al.},
  journal      = {World Tax Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59403/29r4aza},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Anti-Tax Avoidance Rules and Tax Complexity

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.