Generative AI at Work

Erik Brynjolfsson et al.

The Quarterly Journal of Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044article
FT50AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.78

Abstract

We study the staggered introduction of a generative AI–based conversational assistant using data from 5,172 customer-support agents. Access to AI assistance increases worker productivity, as measured by issues resolved per hour, by 15% on average, with substantial heterogeneity across workers. The effects vary significantly across different agents. Less experienced and lower-skilled workers improve both the speed and quality of their output, while the most experienced and highest-skilled workers see small gains in speed and small declines in quality. We also find evidence that AI assistance facilitates worker learning and improves English fluency, particularly among international agents. While AI systems improve with more training data, we find that the gains from AI adoption are largest for moderately rare problems, where human agents have less baseline experience but the system still has adequate training data. Finally, we provide evidence that AI assistance improves the experience of work along several dimensions: customers are more polite and less likely to ask to speak to a manager.

336 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{erik2025,
  title        = {{Generative AI at Work}},
  author       = {Erik Brynjolfsson et al.},
  journal      = {The Quarterly Journal of Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Generative AI at Work

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.78

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact1.00 × 0.4 = 0.40
M · momentum1.00 × 0.15 = 0.15
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.