arbiter
JournalsAccount

Conceptualizing nation branding in the field of higher education: a systematic literature review

Min Ji Kim & Annette Bamberger

Journal of Marketing for Higher Education2025https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2025.2567835article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

This article draws on a qualitative systematic literature review of 40 peer-reviewed articles across multiple disciplines to examine how higher education (HE) is framed within nation branding discourse. Using Kaneva’s, N. (2011. Nation branding: Toward an agenda for critical research. International Journal of Communication, 5(25), 117–141. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/704/514) tripartite model of nation branding approaches as an analytical lens, we analyze how different perspectives assign roles to HE and reveal the close entanglement between nation branding and the internationalization of HE. We find that the economic-technical approach predominates, often portraying HE as an instrument of national competitiveness. The study identifies key conceptual and geographical gaps and suggests alternative perspectives that could enrich future scholarship and practice. It highlights the need for more inclusive and critically engaged approaches, particularly as global educational alliances, international student flows, and geopolitical landscapes continue to evolve.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2025.2567835

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{min2025,
  title        = {{Conceptualizing nation branding in the field of higher education: a systematic literature review}},
  author       = {Min Ji Kim & Annette Bamberger},
  journal      = {Journal of Marketing for Higher Education},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2025.2567835},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Conceptualizing nation branding in the field of higher education: a systematic literature review

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.