Administrative Burdens in the Social Safety Net

Pamela Herd & Donald P. Moynihan

Journal of Economic Perspectives2025https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20231394article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Administrative burdens shape people’s experiences of, and access to, social safety net programs. They can undermine the goals these programs are trying to achieve. Such burdens are the experience of policy implementation as onerous, and arise via learning costs (knowing about the existence of and requirements of public services), compliance costs (time and effort spent dealing with bureaucratic demands, such as paperwork and documentation), and psychological costs (emotional responses to citizen-state interactions). Such frictions can substantially limit eligible peoples’ access to public services they want, would benefit from, and are legally entitled to receive. Those with the fewest resources, and the greatest needs, may struggle more to overcome burdens; the frictions thereby reinforcing existing inequality. As a research approach, administrative burden offers an intuitive and accessible way for policy actors and researchers to improve state capacity and the delivery of public services.

6 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20231394

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{pamela2025,
  title        = {{Administrative Burdens in the Social Safety Net}},
  author       = {Pamela Herd & Donald P. Moynihan},
  journal      = {Journal of Economic Perspectives},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20231394},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Administrative Burdens in the Social Safety Net

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.44 × 0.4 = 0.18
M · momentum0.65 × 0.15 = 0.10
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.