Mortality forecasting via multi-task neural networks

Luca De Mori et al.

ASTIN Bulletin2025https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2025.10article
AJG 2ABDC A*
Weight
0.46

Abstract

In recent decades, analysing the progression of mortality rates has become very important for both public and private pension schemes, as well as for the life insurance branch of insurance companies. Traditionally, the tools used in this field were based on stochastic and deterministic approaches that allow extrapolating mortality rates beyond the last year of observation. More recently, new techniques based on machine learning have been introduced as alternatives to traditional models, giving practitioners new opportunities. Among these, neural networks (NNs) play an important role due to their computation power and flexibility to treat the data without any probabilistic assumption. In this paper, we apply multi-task NNs, whose approach is based on leveraging useful information contained in multiple related tasks to help improve the generalized performance of all the tasks, to forecast mortality rates. Finally, we compare the performance of multi-task NNs to that of existing single-task NNs and traditional stochastic models on mortality data from 17 different countries.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2025.10

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{luca2025,
  title        = {{Mortality forecasting via multi-task neural networks}},
  author       = {Luca De Mori et al.},
  journal      = {ASTIN Bulletin},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2025.10},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mortality forecasting via multi-task neural networks

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.