ChatGPT & Other Generative AI Tools as University Teaching Aids

Stuart Hargreaves

Legal Education Review2025https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.137110article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper describes experimentation with various generative AI tools in the delivery of a large lecture course at a law school between September and December 2023. Three techniques were adopted – AI-generated lecture summaries, AI-generated quizzes used in a ‘low-stakes’ setting, and a course chatbot. The paper explains the process used to employ each of these and reviews student surveys as to their effectiveness. It argues that the experiment shows that AI tools can be deployed at low cost and can be very effective in allowing course instructors to add forms of informal, formative assessment where a lack of resources might otherwise make that prohibitive.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.137110

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{stuart2025,
  title        = {{ChatGPT & Other Generative AI Tools as University Teaching Aids}},
  author       = {Stuart Hargreaves},
  journal      = {Legal Education Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.137110},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

ChatGPT & Other Generative AI Tools as University Teaching Aids

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.