arbiter
JournalsAccount

’O sole Mio —recognizable originality after Mio/konektra

Anett Pogácsás

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice2026https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpag030article
ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In the joined cases of Mio and konektra, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) addressed the relationship between copyright and design protection, as well as the assessment of originality, and reaffirmed long-standing principles; with regard to the copyright infringement test, it explained the application of the recognizability criterion and the relevance of parallel creation.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpag030

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anett2026,
  title        = {{’O sole Mio —recognizable originality after Mio/konektra}},
  author       = {Anett Pogácsás},
  journal      = {Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpag030},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

’O sole Mio —recognizable originality after Mio/konektra

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.