arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Reciprocal Dynamics of Agile HRM Practices, Employee Engagement and Employee Resilience

Charles Hanu et al.

African Journal of Employee Relations2025https://doi.org/10.25159/2664-3731/17739article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This study explored the bidirectional relationships between agile human resource management (HRM) practices, employee engagement and employee resilience. It also assessed the mediating role of engagement between agile HRM and resilience, and the moderating role of innovative work culture in the engagement–resilience link. The data were collected at two time points from 383 and 259 employees of a diversified holding company. Using SmartPLS-SEM, the study confirmed a reciprocal relationship among agile HRM practices, employee engagement and employee resilience. Notably, engagement significantly mediated the effects of agile HRM practices on resilience. The reverse relationship was also supported; resilience and engagement enhance agile HRM practices over time. However, the moderating effect of an innovative work culture on engagement and resilience relationship was not significant. These results highlight the need for HR strategies that not only implement agile HRM practices but also promote engagement to a resilient workforce, especially in emerging markets.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25159/2664-3731/17739

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{charles2025,
  title        = {{Reciprocal Dynamics of Agile HRM Practices, Employee Engagement and Employee Resilience}},
  author       = {Charles Hanu et al.},
  journal      = {African Journal of Employee Relations},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25159/2664-3731/17739},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reciprocal Dynamics of Agile HRM Practices, Employee Engagement and Employee Resilience

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.