Female enfranchisement and the conservative voting gap: Evidence from gender-separated precinct returns

Mathias Bühler & Navid Sabet

European Journal of Political Economy2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2026.102828article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Newly enfranchised German women in the 1920s consistently voted against the party that had secured their political rights. Despite being poorer and mobilized largely through the Social Democratic Party, women’s vote share for confessional center parties was 10 percentage points higher than men’s. To understand why, we leverage a unique institutional feature of Munich’s 1924 election: ballots counted separately by gender. This allows us to construct precinct-level observations of male and female voting behavior which we link to newly digitized pre-suffrage data on occupations, socioeconomic status, and religion. While religious identity serves as a powerful predictor of female voting behavior, proxies for material self-interest have no explanatory power, suggesting that the ’identity payoff’ dominated the ’redistributive payoff’ for newly enfranchised women. Our findings demonstrate that cultural and religious identity, more than material self-interest, can shape the voting behavior of disadvantaged groups.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2026.102828

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mathias2026,
  title        = {{Female enfranchisement and the conservative voting gap: Evidence from gender-separated precinct returns}},
  author       = {Mathias Bühler & Navid Sabet},
  journal      = {European Journal of Political Economy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2026.102828},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Female enfranchisement and the conservative voting gap: Evidence from gender-separated precinct returns

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.